If the parties have agreed on a sale "EXW", "FOB", "CIF", or "CFR", the respective rights and duties of the parties under the contract are to be determined according to the latest version of the International Commercial Terms (INCOTERMS®) issued by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) unless the parties have indicated that a different meaning is to be attributed to the term used.
"This rule is to be used only for sea or inland waterway transport.
'Free on Board' means that the seller delivers the goods on board the vessel nominated by the buyer at the named port of shipment or procures the goods already so delivered. The risk of loss of or damage to the goods passes when the goods are on board the vessel, and the buyer bears all costs from that moment onwards.
The seller is required either to deliver the goods on board the vessel or to procure goods already so delivered for shipment. The reference to 'procure' here caters for multiple sales down a chain ('string sales'), particularly common in the commodity trades.
FOB may not be appropriate where goods are handed over to the carrier before they are on board the vessel, for example goods in containers, which are typically delivered at a terminal. In such situations, the FCA rule should be used.
FOB requires the seller to clear the goods for export, where applicable. However, the seller has no obligation to clear the goods for import, pay any import duty or carry out any import customs formalities."
"This rule is to be used only for sea or inland waterway transport.
'Cost, Insurance and Freight' means that the seller delivers the goods on board the vessel or procures the goods already so delivered. The risk of loss of or damage to the goods passes when the goods are on board the vessel. The seller must contract for and pay the costs and freight necessary to bring the goods to the named port of destination.
When CPT, CIP, CFR, or CIF are used, the seller fulfils its obligation to deliver when it hands the goods over to the carrier in the manner specified in the chosen rule and not when the goods reach the place of destination.
This rule has two critical points, because risk passes and costs are transferred at different places. While the contract will always specify a destination port, it might not specify the port of shipment, which is where risk passes to the buyer. If the shipment port is of particular interest to the buyer, the parties are well advised to identify it as precisely as possible in the contract.
The parties are well advised to identify as precisely as possible the point at the agreed port of destination, as the costs to that point are for the account of the seller. The seller is advised to procure contracts of carriage that match this choice precisely. If the seller incurs costs under its contract of carriage related to unloading at the specified point at the port of destination, the seller is not entitled to recover such costs from the buyer unless otherwise agreed between the parties.
The seller is required either to deliver the goods on board the vessel or to procure goods already so delivered for shipment to the destination. In addition the seller is required either to make a contract of carriage or to procure such a contract. The reference to 'procure' here caters for multiple sales down a chain ('string sales'), particularly common in the commodity trades.
CIF may not be appropriate where goods are handed over to the carrier before they are on board the vessel, for example goods in containers, which are typically delivered at a terminal. In such circumstances, the CIP rule should be used.
CIF requires the seller to clear the goods for export, where applicable. However, the seller has no obligation to clear the goods for import, pay any import duty or carry out any import customs formalities."
Arbitral Awards
ICC Award No. 3130, Clunet 1981, at 932 et seq.ICC Award No. 3894, Clunet 1982, at 987 et seq.ICC Award No. 5910, Clunet 1988, at 1216 et seq.Court Decisions
BGH Urteil vom 7.12.2012, Az. VIII ZR 108/12Doctrine
Derains, Bertrand, note to ICC Award No. 14748, Clunet 2016, at 627 et seq.Derains, Yves, note to ICC Award No. 3130, Clunet 1981, at 935 et seq.Derains, Yves, note to ICC Award No. 3894, Clunet 1982, at 989 et seq.Derains, Yves, note to ICC Award No. 5910, Clunet 1988, at 1220 et seq.Eisemann, Frédéric, Usages de la vente commerciale internationale, Paris 1983.Fouchard, Philippe, L'Arbitrage Commercial International, Paris 1965Goldman, Berthold, Frontières du Droit et Lex Mercatoria, 9 Archives de Philosophie du Droit 1964, at 177 et seq.Kahn, Philippe, La Vente Commerciale Internationale, Paris 1961Randall, Kenneth C./ Norris, John E., A New Paradigm for International Business Transactions, 71 Wash. Univ. L.Q. 1993, at 599 et seq.Schmitthoff, Clive, International Trade Usages, Institute of International Business Law And Practice Newsletter, Special Issue, ICC Publ.440,4, Paris 1987UN Document A/6396 (Report to the UN Secretary General, "The Schmitthoff Study") of September 23, 1966National Legislation
UAE Law of Commercial Procedure 1994(...) Each shipment shall be considered as a separate and independent contract. In case of CIF or CFR term, shipment of the goods within the time stipulated on the face hereof shall be subject to shipping space being available. In case of FOB term, Buyer shall provide necessary shipping space and give shipping instructions in a timely manner (...)
Unless otherwise specified herein, all trade terms used in the contract shall be interpreted in accordance with the latest INCOTERMS of the International Chamber of Commerce