Title

VII.3.2 - Calculation of damages

Content

No. VII.3.2 - Calculation of damages

(a) Damages to which the party who suffers a loss from the failure of the other party to deliver is entitled are typically measured by the market value of the benefit of which the aggrieved party has been deprived through the breach, or the costs of reasonable measures to bring about the situation that would have existed had the contract been properly performed.

(b) The aggrieved party may calculate his loss

i)

based on the difference between the contract price and the price of a replacement transaction (e.g. substitute sale or substitute purchase) concluded within a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner or,

ii)

based on the difference between the price in the unexecuted contract and the market price current at the date of default and at the place where the contract should have been performed, or, if there is no current price at that place, the current price at such other place that appears reasonable to take as a reference.

Commentary

1 The Principle is based on the idea of damages as full compensation of the losses sustained by the aggrieved party and specifies the ways in which the aggrieved party may calculate the losses to be compensated by the damages.

2 Subsection (a) provides a general guideline for the calculation of the aggrieved party's direct loss resulting from the other party's breach. Such damage is typically measured by the difference between the value to the aggrieved party of the performance that should have been received and the value to that party of what, if anything, actually was received by it from the party in breach. The value is to be determined by reference to the market value of the benefit. Alternatively, the aggrieved party is entitled to recover the costs of measures it undertook to place it in the same position that it would have been in had the contract been properly performed by the party in breach, provided that such measures were reasonable.

3Subsection (b) is modelled after Artt. 75, 76 CISG. It provides the aggrieved party with alternative ways of calculating its damage. The aggrieved party may calculate its direct loss with reference to a replacement transaction actually concluded by it, provided that this transaction is concluded, for the protection of the non-performing party, within a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner, or with reference to the market price at the date of default and at the place where the contract should have been performed, or, if there is no current price at that place, the current price at such other place that appears reasonable to take as a reference.

References

Doctrine

Blase, Friedrich/Höttler, Philipp, Remarks on the Damages Provisions in the CISG, Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) and UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UPICC)Derains, Bertraud, Note to ICC Award No. 10988, Clunet 2006, at 1413 et seq.Domingo, Ortega, Rodriguez-Antolin, Zambrana, Principios de Derecho Global, Navarra, 2006Gotanda, John Y, Recovering Lost Profits In International Disputes, Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 36 No.1, at 61 et seq.Jolivet, Emmanuel, Note to ICC Award No.10422, Clunet 2003, 1150 et seq.Note to ICC Award No. 7081, Clunet 2003, at 1137 et seq.

Court Decisions

Chaplin v. Hicks [1911] 2 KB 786

Miscellaneous

CISG Advisory Council Opinion No. 6: Calculation of Damages under CISG Article 74CISG Advisory Council Opinion No. 8: Calculation of Damages under CISG Articles 75 and 76Decision taken by the Governing Council of the United Nations Compensation Commission, S/AC.26/1992/9, 06 March 1992

International Legislation

Fontaine, Marcel, OHADA Uniform Act On Contract Law Preliminary DraftUnited Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)

National Legislation

GIW DDRUK Sale Of Goods Act 1979, Chapter 54

Arbitral Awards

ICC award in case no. 8362 of 1995, YCA 1997, at 164 et seq.ICC Award No. 10329, YCA 2004, at 108 et seq.ICC Award No. 10422, Clunet 2003, 1142 etseq.ICC Award No. 10988, Clunet 2006, at 1408 et seq.ICC Award No. 1250, YCA 1980, at 168 et seq.ICC Award No. 13133, YCA 2010, 129 et seq.ICC Award No. 5418 of 1987, YCA 1988, at 91 et seq.ICC Award No. 7081, Clunet 2003, at 1131 et seq.ICC Award No. 8501, Clunet 2001, at 1164 et seq.ICC Award. No. 9800, Clunet 2004, 1284 et seq.ICC Final Award No. 11849, YCA 2006, at 148 et seq.ICSID Award of December 29, 2004, Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka A.S. v. The Slovak Republic, Case No. ARB/97/4, http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/Cesk-Slovakia-AwardDec2004.pdf

Principles / Restatements

Principles of European Contract Law - PECLUNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016

Model Terms

Standard Contracts for the UK Offshore & Gas Industry, General Conditions of Contract (inlcuding Guidance Notes) for Marine Construction, 2nd Ed., Aberdeen 2003, at 1 et seq.

Contract Clauses

1. Equitable RemediesEmployment Contract