Where, after the interpretation of a contract term that has been supplied by one party, doubts remain as to the meaning of that term, an interpretation against that party is to be preferred ("contra proferentem").
This agreement has been fully reviewed and negotiated by the parties hereto and their respective counsel. Accordingly, in interpreting this agreement, no weight shall be placed upon which party hereto or its counsel drafted the provision being interpreted - (International Contracting: Law and Practice - Larry A. DiMatteo - §9.03 - S. 330).
(...) Any ambiguity shall not be interpreted against the drafting Party.
2009The parties hereto have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement and, in the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as jointly drafted by the parties hereto and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement.
2010Each Party acknowledges that it has participated in the drafting of this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents to which it is a party, and that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be applied in the construction or interpretation of this Agreement or the other Transaction Documents.
2012The parties agree that each of them and their respective counsel has reviewed and had an opportunity to revise the Transaction Documents and, therefore, the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party will not be employed in the interpretation of the Transaction Documents or any amendments hereto.
2014(...) any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply to the interpretation of this Agreement.
(...) The language in this Agreement shall be construed as to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any party (...)
Each of this Bridge Note and the other Transaction Documents is the result of negotiations among, and has been reviewed by, Company, Investor and their respective counsel. Accordingly, this Bridge Note and the other Transaction Documents shall be deemed to be the product of Company and Investor, and no ambiguity shall be construed in favor of or against Company or Investor.
2002The parties mutually acknowledge that they and their attorneys have participated in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement. In cases of uncertainty this Agreement shall be construed without regard to which of the parties caused the uncertainty to exist.
2011The parties mutually acknowledge that they and their attorneys have participated in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement. In cases of uncertainty this Agreement shall be construed without regard to which of the parties caused the uncertainty to exist.
2012This Agreement has been jointly negotiated and drafted. The language of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against either of the parties.
2005The Parties have participated jointly in negotiating and drafting this Agreement. In the event that an ambiguity or a question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed without regard to any presumption or rule requiring construction or interpretation against the Party drafting or causing any instrument to be drafted.
2013No provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in favor of, or against, any of the Parties by reason of the extent to which any such party or its counsel participated in the drafting thereof or by reason of the extent to which any such provision is inconsistent with any prior draft of this Agreement or such provision.
2005This Memorandum of Agreement will be construed fairly as to each party regardless of which party drafted it.
2006No provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in favor of, or against, any of the Parties by reason of the extent to which any such Party or its counsel participated in the drafting thereof or by reason of the extent to which any such provision is inconsistent with any prior draft of this Agreement or such provision.
2007
Please cite as: "Commentary to Trans-Lex Principle , https://www.trans-lex.org/926000"